|
|
Post by Shevy on Jun 28, 2005 5:20:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by 1:( on Jun 28, 2005 10:19:08 GMT -5
King King?
|
|
|
|
Post by Shevy on Jun 28, 2005 16:16:57 GMT -5
Mi mistack. i fixd it four yuo.
|
|
|
|
Post by smcproductions on Jun 30, 2005 0:10:23 GMT -5
looks cool. weird how jack black is in this. never woulda guessed. if it's anything like the new godzilla though......shit do i need to finish that sentence?
|
|
|
|
Post by Shevy on Jun 30, 2005 4:09:47 GMT -5
1. The casting of Jack Black was a really smart move. I have a feeling he's going to kick ass as a seedy film director.
2. What I really like about the new King Kong's style is it hasn't been modernized. Everything takes place back in the 30's...as opposed to Godzilla which was so bad even Jean Reno couldn't save it. It has a really classic monster movie feel with giant bugs and King Kong fighting dinosaurs. I love it!
|
|
|
|
Post by BigTimeOperator on Jul 6, 2005 23:25:28 GMT -5
Peter Jackson is the ONLY person I know who can make a movie for over $100 million and it still havea good plot and script.
If Wes Anderson (good scripts)and Roland Emmerich (master of big budget movies with no plots) had a baby....that baby would be Peter Jackson!
|
|
thrashed
Hauptmann
sucks a mean D
Posts: 1,524
|
Post by thrashed on Jul 7, 2005 21:54:49 GMT -5
It's going to suck like all the other new movies these todays. Just another cheap remake of a true classic.
Well I don't know since Jack Black is in it, it might be decent. They should have put Tom Green in it instead though haha. That would have been the shit!
|
|
|
|
Post by Shevy on Jul 8, 2005 4:49:50 GMT -5
Remaking King Kong is nothing new, though.
|
|
